<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for BLOGCEA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogcea.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogcea.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Framework for Teacher Evaluations by R Bourdeau</title>
		<link>http://blogcea.org/2012/01/25/peac-consensus/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R Bourdeau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcea.org/?p=3311#comment-1532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also think standardized tests (as currently implemented) lack validity. And even if someone came up with valid ones, a fairer indicator of teacher performance is a &quot;change model&quot; that measures student improvement. Use straight test scores and there is a incentive to only work with more cognitively advanced students. You think we have an achievement gap now -- we want to narrow it, not make it wider!

Also, while parent and student opinions are very important (they are our customers, after all), I don&#039;t think their feedback should be part of the CALCULATED formula. Both are too volatile,subjective, and can be driven by attitudes antithesis to good teaching (&quot;I hate that teacher because my kid deserved an A!&quot;. Instead, gather student and teacher feedback and if there is a pattern indicating a legitimate issue, then administrators should investigate and if necessary initiate remediation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think standardized tests (as currently implemented) lack validity. And even if someone came up with valid ones, a fairer indicator of teacher performance is a &#8220;change model&#8221; that measures student improvement. Use straight test scores and there is a incentive to only work with more cognitively advanced students. You think we have an achievement gap now &#8212; we want to narrow it, not make it wider!</p>
<p>Also, while parent and student opinions are very important (they are our customers, after all), I don&#8217;t think their feedback should be part of the CALCULATED formula. Both are too volatile,subjective, and can be driven by attitudes antithesis to good teaching (&#8220;I hate that teacher because my kid deserved an A!&#8221;. Instead, gather student and teacher feedback and if there is a pattern indicating a legitimate issue, then administrators should investigate and if necessary initiate remediation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Framework for Teacher Evaluations by Education Votes</title>
		<link>http://blogcea.org/2012/01/25/peac-consensus/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Education Votes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcea.org/?p=3311#comment-1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Find specifics on the changes by visiting BlogCEA.org. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Find specifics on the changes by visiting BlogCEA.org. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Framework for Teacher Evaluations by Matthew P. Valenti</title>
		<link>http://blogcea.org/2012/01/25/peac-consensus/#comment-1527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew P. Valenti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcea.org/?p=3311#comment-1527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m disgusted that the politicians think they can somehow &quot;fix&quot; this.  They are going to stop people from entering the profession.  Low pay, no heath insurance at retirement, hassles from parents, students, and administrators.  Teachers are educators, not nannies.  I can&#039;t think of another profession where you get &quot;questioned&quot; about what you are doing.  No one would think of questioning my musical expertise as a performer, but parents think they know better somehow than a professional teachers.

The more things we throw at teachers, the more chance there is for prospective teachers look elsewhere for work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m disgusted that the politicians think they can somehow &#8220;fix&#8221; this.  They are going to stop people from entering the profession.  Low pay, no heath insurance at retirement, hassles from parents, students, and administrators.  Teachers are educators, not nannies.  I can&#8217;t think of another profession where you get &#8220;questioned&#8221; about what you are doing.  No one would think of questioning my musical expertise as a performer, but parents think they know better somehow than a professional teachers.</p>
<p>The more things we throw at teachers, the more chance there is for prospective teachers look elsewhere for work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Do You Send Your Kids to Public School? by Sarah</title>
		<link>http://blogcea.org/2011/10/11/why-public-school/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcea.org/?p=3093#comment-1526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I struggled with this decision. 

After interviewing two local private schools, I discovered my kids (at the age of 3) were seen as &quot;unworthy of kindergarten&quot; because they couldn&#039;t yet read. Yes, you read that correctly. My children couldn&#039;t read at the age of 3, so I was told they needed to be held back for one year instead of starting kindergarten TWO YEARS LATER. 

I cried at this news. I wanted them to be with their friends in their own age group. 

I kept them in the private preschool program until age 5. Then, I decided to speak with the local public school kindergarten teachers. 

They told me about a wonderful program they have at the school. It is a program intended for kids who need extra help with reading. They meet after school, in small groups, and teach in fun ways. Mid-way through kindergarten, my kids can READ!!! 

Why do I chose public school? Because they did not give up on my kids. Private school did.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I struggled with this decision. </p>
<p>After interviewing two local private schools, I discovered my kids (at the age of 3) were seen as &#8220;unworthy of kindergarten&#8221; because they couldn&#8217;t yet read. Yes, you read that correctly. My children couldn&#8217;t read at the age of 3, so I was told they needed to be held back for one year instead of starting kindergarten TWO YEARS LATER. </p>
<p>I cried at this news. I wanted them to be with their friends in their own age group. </p>
<p>I kept them in the private preschool program until age 5. Then, I decided to speak with the local public school kindergarten teachers. </p>
<p>They told me about a wonderful program they have at the school. It is a program intended for kids who need extra help with reading. They meet after school, in small groups, and teach in fun ways. Mid-way through kindergarten, my kids can READ!!! </p>
<p>Why do I chose public school? Because they did not give up on my kids. Private school did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Framework for Teacher Evaluations by J O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://blogcea.org/2012/01/25/peac-consensus/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J O'Donnell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcea.org/?p=3311#comment-1525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is all well and good, with one glaring problem.  I don&#039;t believe that any one standardized test written by an amorphous state agency can be considered reliable OR valid.  And it&#039;s being phased out in 3 years anyway...to be replace by what?  One test tells you nothing...except how a student was doing on one particular day.  Crazy stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all well and good, with one glaring problem.  I don&#8217;t believe that any one standardized test written by an amorphous state agency can be considered reliable OR valid.  And it&#8217;s being phased out in 3 years anyway&#8230;to be replace by what?  One test tells you nothing&#8230;except how a student was doing on one particular day.  Crazy stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Framework for Teacher Evaluations by Laurel Killough</title>
		<link>http://blogcea.org/2012/01/25/peac-consensus/#comment-1524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurel Killough]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcea.org/?p=3311#comment-1524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CEA remains true to its goals of advocating for respect and fairness, and ensuring a fair dismissal process for teachers faced with potential termination and fighting to get more, better, and consistent professional development and evaluations for teachers. CEA&#039;s education reform plan - A View from the Classroom: Proven Ideas for Student Achievement, includes reforming the teacher evaluation process and replacing tenure as we know it, with a streamlined dismissal process for underperforming teachers. The CEA evaluation and tenure proposals are part of a comprehensive reform agenda that are research based and cover everything from adequate funding to small class sizes to proven programs that can transform local schools that need help to improve student achievement.   

At a news conference on Jan. 3, Mary Loftus Levine and Phil Apruzzese outlined CEA&#039;s position reflected in the CEA resolutions adopted by the Representative Assembly, spelled out in the CEA legislative agenda adopted by the Board of Directors, and identified in the comprehensive work of the Committee on the Future.  CEA stated at the news conference that when we stand for greater accountability for everyone involved in public schools, teachers demonstrate that we&#039;re dedicated professionals deserving of respect.  Key reforms include 1) an evaluation system using multiple indicators of teacher quality rather than relying on test scores alone, 2) support to help struggling teachers improve, and 3) a streamlined dismissal process to remove underperforming teachers while still allowing for due process.

Go here to read some of the stories written about the plan http://www.cea.org/issues/news/2012/view-from-classroom-news-articles.cfm or watch TV clips of the news conference http://www.youtube.com/ceavideo.

You can find the plan, &quot;A View from the Classroom,&quot; at www.cea.org.

For more information, contact your local UniServ Rep.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CEA remains true to its goals of advocating for respect and fairness, and ensuring a fair dismissal process for teachers faced with potential termination and fighting to get more, better, and consistent professional development and evaluations for teachers. CEA&#8217;s education reform plan &#8211; A View from the Classroom: Proven Ideas for Student Achievement, includes reforming the teacher evaluation process and replacing tenure as we know it, with a streamlined dismissal process for underperforming teachers. The CEA evaluation and tenure proposals are part of a comprehensive reform agenda that are research based and cover everything from adequate funding to small class sizes to proven programs that can transform local schools that need help to improve student achievement.   </p>
<p>At a news conference on Jan. 3, Mary Loftus Levine and Phil Apruzzese outlined CEA&#8217;s position reflected in the CEA resolutions adopted by the Representative Assembly, spelled out in the CEA legislative agenda adopted by the Board of Directors, and identified in the comprehensive work of the Committee on the Future.  CEA stated at the news conference that when we stand for greater accountability for everyone involved in public schools, teachers demonstrate that we&#8217;re dedicated professionals deserving of respect.  Key reforms include 1) an evaluation system using multiple indicators of teacher quality rather than relying on test scores alone, 2) support to help struggling teachers improve, and 3) a streamlined dismissal process to remove underperforming teachers while still allowing for due process.</p>
<p>Go here to read some of the stories written about the plan <a href="http://www.cea.org/issues/news/2012/view-from-classroom-news-articles.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cea.org/issues/news/2012/view-from-classroom-news-articles.cfm</a> or watch TV clips of the news conference <a href="http://www.youtube.com/ceavideo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/ceavideo</a>.</p>
<p>You can find the plan, &#8220;A View from the Classroom,&#8221; at <a href="http://www.cea.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.cea.org</a>.</p>
<p>For more information, contact your local UniServ Rep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Framework for Teacher Evaluations by Carrie Blackmar</title>
		<link>http://blogcea.org/2012/01/25/peac-consensus/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carrie Blackmar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcea.org/?p=3311#comment-1522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just attended a CEA meeting in Woodstock on Tuesday.  At that meeting, a CEA representative told us that CEA supports teacher tenure and will push to keep it by working with the governor to improve the teacher evaluation system.  However, the CEA ad on TV ends with a comment that the CEA and teachers support REPLACING teacher tenure.  I&#039;m concerned with the difference in the message given to teachers in the union meeting vs the very public message in the ad campaign.  It makes me question the true motives of the people representing public school teachers and their honesty with the viewing public.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just attended a CEA meeting in Woodstock on Tuesday.  At that meeting, a CEA representative told us that CEA supports teacher tenure and will push to keep it by working with the governor to improve the teacher evaluation system.  However, the CEA ad on TV ends with a comment that the CEA and teachers support REPLACING teacher tenure.  I&#8217;m concerned with the difference in the message given to teachers in the union meeting vs the very public message in the ad campaign.  It makes me question the true motives of the people representing public school teachers and their honesty with the viewing public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Framework for Teacher Evaluations by Karen</title>
		<link>http://blogcea.org/2012/01/25/peac-consensus/#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcea.org/?p=3311#comment-1521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[22.5% will be based on the CMT?!  Really?  Seems unfair to those who don&#039;t specifically teach Math/LA/Science.  Yes, I use math &amp; LA in my curriculum, but I am a highly qualified teacher in my discipline, not in all that the CMT tests.  Thank goodness I teach in a successful district.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22.5% will be based on the CMT?!  Really?  Seems unfair to those who don&#8217;t specifically teach Math/LA/Science.  Yes, I use math &amp; LA in my curriculum, but I am a highly qualified teacher in my discipline, not in all that the CMT tests.  Thank goodness I teach in a successful district.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Helping Students Succeed by Listening to Teachers by Education Votes</title>
		<link>http://blogcea.org/2012/01/06/helping-students-succeed/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Education Votes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcea.org/?p=3270#comment-1497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Find out more at BlogCEA.org. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Find out more at BlogCEA.org. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop Social Security COLA Changes That Could Affect CT Teachers by Pat Hofperson</title>
		<link>http://blogcea.org/2011/07/12/social-security-cola-changes/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat Hofperson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcea.org/?p=2730#comment-1422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess the government is just hoping that we die off early so that we don&#039;t collect any money from social security or our teaching pension.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the government is just hoping that we die off early so that we don&#8217;t collect any money from social security or our teaching pension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

